Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 WASH 427 - Forsberg v. Lundgren

Forsberg v. Lundgren’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
August 1986
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1986

7 state decisions

4019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kollock v. Parcher · Campbell v. Sterling Manufacturing Co. · Ryan v. Guilfoil · Hadlock v. Shumway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as there used could only apply to things of the same unfinished nature as the things enumerated, and that fence posts, whether sawed or split, would thus come under the definition of lumber as defined in the second section of the act of 1893. The amendment of 1895, inserting the words”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.