Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Wash. 2d 207 - Alaska v. Baker

64 Wash. 2d 207 - Alaska v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2005

4 state decisions

2019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 4 U.S.C. § 106

Relies on Johnson v. State of Maryland · Howard v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund of Louisville · Leslie Miller, Inc. v. Arkansas · City of Louisville v. Sebree

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No person shall be relieved from liability for any income tax levied by any State, or by any duly constituted taxing authority therein, having jurisdiction to levy such a tax, by reason of his residing within a Federal area or receiving income from transactions occurring or services performed in such area; and such State or taxing authority shall have full jurisdiction and. power to levy and collect such tax in any Federal area within such State to the same extent and with the same effect as though such area was not a Federal area.” 4 U.S.C.A. § 106 (a) [ 61 Stat. 641 (1947)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Act and such application to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Concerning the penalty and interest sought to be collected from respondents, these must be set aside and cancelled as barred by the respective statutes of limitations of the states of Alaska and Washington.” 17”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.