64 Wash. 2d 445 - State v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 106 Wash. 2d 144 - State v. Stroud (1986), Johnson v. State (1978)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McNabb v. United States · Haynes v. Washington · Upshaw v. United States · Abbrescia v. United States · State v. Hughlett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“future developments, or a conviction that law enforcement agencies of the state are persistently indulging in undue and extensive delays between arrest and arraignment, may dictate a reconsideration of our position.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Although we will and do attach significant weight to findings of fact upon disputed issues arising under Rule 101.20W, supra, we cannot blindly and conclusively accept such as indisputably establishing the pertinent facts. It is our duty and obligation, where basic constitutional rights are involved, to carefully review the record brought before us and determine therefrom whether the bounds of due process requirements have been exceeded. Haynes v. Washington, supra; State v. Rutherford, 63 Wn. (2d) 949, 389 P. (2d) 895 . We are mindful, in this respect, that it is not our function to reevaluate the credibility of the witnesses testifying. State v. Reed, supra [ 56 Wn.2d 668 , 354 P.2d 935 (1960)]. Our prime concern is that it be convincingly evident from the record that constitutional privileges have not been abused. Strained find ings of fact, predicated upon translucent or sophisticated evidence, cannot stand.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.