Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Wash. App. 283 - State v. Harper

64 Wash. App. 283 - State v. Harper’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2021

18 state decisions

1301992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Walker v. Illinois · 109 Wash. 2d 222 - State v. Thomas · 105 Wash. 2d 692 - State v. Kwan Fai Mak · 96 Wash. 2d 215 - State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “— which if believed by the same jury might cause them to acquit — were denied a fair trial, i.e. failed to receive substantial justice. Surely we have to answer in the negative, or finality goes by the boards and the system fails. Id. (citation omitted). ¶ 27. We note also that the Wisconsin Supreme Court has expressed concern regarding the ability of litigants to procure testimony from psychiatric experts that is”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the defendant loses, then hires a new lawyer, who hires a new expert, who examines the same evidence and produces a new opinion. We cannot accept this as a basis for a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “new expert opinion, based on the facts available to the trial expert, did not constitute 'newly discovered evidence'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.