64 Wash. App. 305 - State v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 102 Wash. 2d 182 - State v. Hicks · State v. Steele · State v. Mason · State v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That the respondent, Justin Matthew Bacani, in King County, Washington, together with others, on or about 9 November 1993, did unlawfully attempt to take personal property, to wit: lawful United States currency, with intent to steal from the person and in the presence of Rebecca Frank and Molly Jorgensen, against their will, by the use or threatened use of immediate force, violence and fear of injury, to such persons or their property ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'unlawfully’ took personal property 'from the person’ ” of his victim was sufficient to notify the defendant of the ownership element. 64 Wn. App. at 308 . Graham is inapposite here, however, because the liberal, rather than the strict, standard applied there. 64 Wn. App. at 307 . The State also contends that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) do the necessary facts appear in any form, or by fair construction can they be found, in the charging document; and, if so, (2) can the defendant show that he or she was nonetheless actually prejudiced by the inartful language which caused a lack of notice?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.