64 Wash. App. 339 - State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · Stringer v. Mississippi · 105 Wash. 2d 398 - State v. Jeffries · 115 Wash. 2d 294 - State v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each sale was independently accomplished upon its completion. Nor was there a continuing sequence of conduct; a break of some significant time occurred between the first and second sales.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Porter · State v. Porter“acts were not part of a single criminal conduct because the commission of one drug deal did not further the commission of the other drug deals, and they were not part of a recognizable scheme or plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Porter“`This section shall not be construed as precluding the prosecution from introducing or relying upon any other evidence or testimony to establish any element of the offense.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Malone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.