State v. Stansbury’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · 103 Wash. 2d 812 - State v. Casal · 109 Wash. 2d 392 - State v. Thetford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ne of the purposes of the in camera hearing is to ascertain whether the informant has testimonial knowledge that would be useful to the defendant at trial or in preparation. Where the informant is a significant participant in the transaction, disclosure may be required. Roviaro . On the other hand, if he does not possess such information, the balancing process does not require disclosure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.