64 Wash. App. 641 - State v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably 224 Wis. 2d 201 - State v. Secrist (1999), 82 Wash. App. 594 - State v. Jackson (1996)
63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Chambers v. Maroney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . [P]robable cause to arrest the occupants of a car for possession of a controlled substance exists when a trained officer detects that the odor of a controlled substance is emanating from a vehicle. . . .Other facts supportive of probable cause include furtive movements and lying to the police, both of which evidence consciousness of guilt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A]n arrest supported by probable cause is not made unlawful by an officer's subjective reliance on ... an offense different from the one for which probable cause exists.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“an arrest not supported by probable cause is not made lawful by an officer’s subjective belief that an offense has been committed. By the same token, [however,] an arrest supported by probable cause is not made unlawful by an officer’s subjective reliance on ... an offense different from the one for which probable cause exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.