Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Wash. App. 76 - State v. Knutson

64 Wash. App. 76 - State v. Knutson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2015

17 state decisions

110199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich · 87 Wash. 2d 374 - State v. Arndt · United States v. UCO Oil Co. · 93 Wash. 2d 288 - State v. Pettitt · 114 Wash. 2d 314 - State v. Burns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o `photograph' means to make a print, negative, slide, digital image, motion picture, or videotape,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Knowingly develops, duplicates, publishes, prints, disseminates, exchanges, finances, attempts to finance, or sells any visual or printed matter that depicts a minor engaged in an act of sexually explicit conduct; or (2) Possesses with intent to develop, duplicate, publish, print, disseminate, exchange, or sell any visual or printed matter that depicts a minor engaged in an act of sexually explicit conduct is guilty of a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “any photograph or other material that contains a reproduction of a photograph,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.