State v. Hackett’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 32 - State v. Ng · 73 Wash. 2d 533 - State v. Dana · 102 Wash. 2d 120 - State v. Rice · 100 Wash. 2d 417 - State v. Griffin · 79 Wash. 2d 805 - State v. Conklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No act committed by a person while in a state of voluntary intoxication is less criminal by reason of that condition. However, evidence of intoxication may be considered in determining whether the defendant [acted] . . . with [intent].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kruger · State v. Kruger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.