Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Wash. App. 801 - State v. Paul

64 Wash. App. 801 - State v. Paul’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 103 Wash. 2d 236 - In Re the Marriage of Hall · 89 Wash. 2d 321 - Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Johnston · 61 Wash. App. 280 - In Re the Dependency of C.B. · 49 Wash. 2d 62 - Annest v. Annest · 80 Wash. 2d 28 - State v. Blubaugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Upon application by the committed or conditionally released person, the secretary shall determine whether or not reasonable grounds exist for final discharge. If the secretary approves the final discharge he or she then shall authorize said person to petition the court. (3) Nothing contained in this chapter shall prohibit the patient from petitioning the court for final discharge or conditional release from the institution in which he or she is committed. The issue to be determined on such proceeding is whether the petitioner is a substantial danger to other persons, or presents a substantial likelihood of committing felonious acts jeopardizing public safety or security, unless kept under further control by the court or other persons or institutions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[E]vidence is said to preponderate when the trial court reasonably finds it to be the most credible. Annest v. Annest, 49 Wn.2d 62 , 298 P.2d 483 (1956). There can be substantial evidence to both prove and disprove a point. The evidence must be weighed to ascertain which preponderates whenever a burden of persuasion requires the preponderance of evidence test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[P]arties must first satisfy the court that they have a quantity of evidence fit to be considered by the trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.