64 Wash. App. 910 - State v. Casarez’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · 115 Wash. 2d 294 - State v. Lewis · 114 Wash. 2d 314 - State v. Burns · 61 Wash. App. 812 - State v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n deciding if crimes encompassed the same criminal conduct, trial courts should focus on the extent to which the criminal intent, as objectively viewed, changed from one crime to the next. . . . [Pjart of this analysis will often include the related issues of whether one crime furthered the other and if the time and place of the two crimes remained the same.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the sentencing court erred when it refused to consider the two deliveries as the same criminal conduct for offender score purposes.” State v. Casarez, 64 Wn. App. 910, 915 , 826 P.2d 1102 (1992). The State petitioned for review. Ill RCW 9.94A.400(1)(a) defines”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“two or more crimes that require the same criminal intent, are committed at the same time and place, and involve the same victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.