64 Wis. 2d 264 - Watson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably 227 Wis. 2d 167 - State v. Watson (1999), 119 Wis. 2d 483 - State v. Walstad (1984)
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Strunk v. United States · 60 Wis. 2d 683 - State v. Cydzik · State v. Brodson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the identification of the chin hair was a matter of expert testimony that could be challenged by cross-examination or by impeaching evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is a proper condition for taking judicial notice of scientific facts, but not a criterion for the admissibility of scientific evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`Any relevant conclusions which are supported by a qualified witness should be received unless there are other reasons for exclusion.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.