Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Wis. 2d 456 - Seidler v. State

64 Wis. 2d 456 - Seidler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
3
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably 141 Wis. 2d 81 - State v. Michels (1987), 76 Wis. 2d 1 - Turner v. State (1977)

46 state decisions

180197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · 53 Wis. 2d 218 - Bautista v. State · 60 Wis. 2d 404 - State v. Weso · Hogan v. State · 44 Wis. 2d 68 - State v. Dolan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The first condition of the statute is, that the act producing death shall be imminently dangerous to others. It has been said that every act producing death must be thus dangerous. Perhaps this is literally true. But the statute does not go on fortuitous or latent danger, but on essential and apparent danger, of the act producing death. The act must be inherently and consciously dangerous to life, not such as casually produces death by misadventure. It must be dangerous in and of itself, as committed and when committed, whether death follow it or not.” Pages 246, 247.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The first element of second degree murder requires that the defendant’s conduct was imminently dangerous to another, that is, conduct dangerous in and of itself. It must have been conduct inherently and consciously dangerous to life and not such as might casually producé death by misadventure.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “consciously threw her at the hard and unyielding portions of the bed,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.