Bodecker v. Local Union No. P-46’s Empirical Analysis
640 F.2d 182 · 1981
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2013
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 104 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 113 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Williams v. Ford Motor Credit Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Bishop · 338 F. Supp. 924 - Barnes & Tucker Co. v. UNITED MINE WKRS. OF AMER.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... “Wages” means compensation owed by an employer for: b. ... sick leave, and severance payment due an employee under an agreement with the employer or under a policy of the employer, (emphasis supplied).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.