United States v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
640 F.2d 284 · 1981
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably 105 Wash. 2d 175 - State v. Ammons (2005), United States v. Easterling (1990)
26 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gault · United States v. Tucker · Hoffman v. United States · Townsend v. Burke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a due process right to be sentenced only on information which is accurate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[t]he Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self incrimination is not self-executing. At least where the government has no substantial reason to believe that the requested disclosures are likely to be incriminating, the privilege may not be relied upon unless it is invoked in a timely fashion.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]here is no question but that the Fifth Amendment does offer protection in the sentencing process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.