Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 640 F.2d 427 - Lawrence v. Staats

Lawrence v. Staats’s Empirical Analysis

640 F.2d 427 · 1981

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2017

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

2001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Bolling v. Sharpe · United States v. American Trucking Associations · Brown v. General Services Administration

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) all civil service positions in the executive branch, except — [positions not relevant here] ... (2) civil service positions not in the executive branch which are specifically included in the competitive service by statute; and (3). positions in the government of the District of Columbia which are specifically included in the competitive service by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “employees ... in those units of the legislative ... branch ( ) of the Federal Government having positions in the competitive service”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in accordance with the civil service laws and regulations,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.