United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
640 F.2d 614 · 1981
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2019
14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Cruz v. Hauck · Parham v. Cortese · Rust v. Johnson · Economic Research Analysts, Inc. v. O'Connell · St. Louis Baptist Temple, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he issue [of materiality] is a question to be decided by the court and is not an issue for the jury to determine. Since this is so, evidence bearing solely on materiality should be received outside the presence of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Vap
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.