Ocasio-Hernández v. Fortuño-Burset’s Empirical Analysis
640 F.3d 1 · 2011
Citation profile
69 federal appellate · 374 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Neitzke v. Williams · Erickson v. Pardus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 508 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The relevant inquiry focuses on the reasonableness of the inference of liability that the plaintiff is asking the court to draw from the facts alleged in the complaint.”
56 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.”
22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.