In re Caterbone’s Empirical Analysis
640 F.3d 108 · 2011
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Bowles v. Russell · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Kontrick v. Ryan · Eberhart v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven though it is a bankruptcy rule that specifies the time within which an appeal must be filed, the statutory incorporation of that rule renders its requirement statutory and, hence, jurisdictional and non-waivable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be taken in the same manner as appeals in civil proceedings generally are taken to the courts of appeals from the district courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'does not allow a party to claim excusable neglect after the time period has expired.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.