Dudum v. Arntz’s Empirical Analysis
640 F.3d 1098 · 2011
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Reynolds v. Sims · Williams v. Rhodes · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Storer v. Brown · Bullock v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Applying these precepts, '[w]e have repeatedly upheld as 'not severe' restrictions that are generally applicable, evenhanded, politically neutral, and protect the reliability and integrity of the election process.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where non-severe, lesser burdens on voting are at stake, we apply less exacting review, and a State's important regulatory interests will usually be enough to justify reasonable, nondiscriminatory restrictions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen a challenged rule imposes only limited burdens on the right to vote, there is no requirement that the rule is the only or best way to further the proffered interests.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.