De La Paz v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
640 F.3d 650 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1357 (§ 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kucana v. Holder · Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales · Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Khalili v. Holder · Carlos Castro-Cortez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Jose Luis Araujo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“finds that an alien has reentered the United States illegally after having been removed or having departed voluntarily, under an order of removal, the prior order of removal is reinstated from its original date and is not subject to being reopened or reviewed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“DHS did not provide Petitioner or his counsel a copy of the reinstatement order, nor did they allow him to make a statement contesting the reinstatement determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“re-vests the circuit courts with jurisdiction over constitutional claims or questions of law raised in the context of reinstatement proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.