Hamptons Locations, Inc. v. Rubens’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1127 (§ 45 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Galdieri-Ambrosini v. National Realty & Development Corp. · Zellner v. Summerlin · Yurman Design, Inc. v. PAJ, Inc. · Lane Capital Management, Inc. v. Lane Capital Management., Inc. · Sporty's Farm LLC v. Sportsman's Market, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he prevailing view is that the ACPA does not require a plaintiff to demonstrate defendant's use in commerce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olivarius v. Mermel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.