640 F. Supp. 2d 351 - Manbeck v. Micka’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 2 U.S.C. § 1981 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where, as here, a police officer exercises independent judgment in how to respond to a private party's legitimate request for assistance, the private party is not jointly engaged ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Anilao v. Spota
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.