Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 640 NE2D 388 - Katner v. State

Katner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2014

5 state decisions

30199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Austin v. United States · United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Commonly Known as 916 Douglas Avenue · United States v. $38,600.00 in U.S. Currency · United States v. One 1976 Ford F-150 Pick-Up Vin F14YUB03797 · 171 Ind. App. 350 - Cooper v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The following may be seized: (1) All vehicles ... if they are used or intended for use by the person ... to transport, or in any manner to facilitate the transportation of the following: (A) A controlled substance for the purpose of committing, attempting to commit, or conspiring to commit any of the following: (vii) Possession of cocaine or a narcotic drug. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While the presence of the cocaine residue in the glass tube was sufficient to support Katner's possession conviction, his possession of the substance in his automobile did not constitute `transportation' of cocaine for the purpose of possessing the drug.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.