Jacobs v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2018
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reaves v. State · Baird v. State · Spangler v. State · Phillips v. State · Wiseheart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An intent to defraud involves an intent to deceive and thereby work a reliance and an injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a paper, a document, or other instrument containing written matter and includes money, coins, tokens, stamps, seals, credit cards, badges, trademarks, medals, retail sales receipts, labels or markings (including a universal product code (UPC) or another product identification code), or other objects or symbols of value, right, privilege, or identification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BORJAS v. State“[i]n making our determination, we must give effect to the plain and ordinary meaning of the language used and may also consider the statute's legislative history, including legislation passed either before or after the statute's enactment”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.