Lamirand v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2001
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Baromich v. State · Shippen v. State · Kendrick v. State · Seay v. State · Watkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the court shall determine whether terms of imprisonment shall be served concurrently or consecutively. (b) If, after being arrested for one (1) crime, a person commits another crime: (1) before the date the person is discharged from probation, parole, or a term of imprisonment imposed for the first crime; or (2) while the person is released: (A) upon the person's own recognizance; or (B) on bond; the terms of imprisonment for the crimes shall be served consecutively, regardless of the order in which the erimes are tried and sentences are imposed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Newsome v. State · Weaver v. State“The court may order terms of imprisonment to be served consecutively even if the sentences are not imposed at the same time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weaver v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.