Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 640 NW2D 626 - Boitnott v. State

Boitnott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dennis v. United States · Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest · Harelson v. United States · Speth v. New Jersey · State v. Knaffla

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he United States Supreme Court has defined the term to mean that (a) the material sought is needed to avoid a possible injustice in another judicial proceeding, (b) the need for disclosure is greater than the need for continued secrecy, and (c) the request is structured to cover only the material so needed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.