Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 640 P.2d 1381 - Menefee v. State

Menefee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
6
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably State v. Lee (1994), Banks v. State (1985)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions

1501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · United States v. Di Re · Abel v. United States · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is well established in federal and other state jurisdictions that the law of the state in which a warrantless arrest takes place determines the validity of the arrest”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is in the interest of both justice and economy to jointly charge and try those alleged to have participated in the same criminal act, and has urged trial courts to do so whenever possible. The decision to grant or deny severance is left to the sound discretion of the trial court, and absent abuse resulting in prejudice to the defendant, the decision will not be disturbed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The purpose of a severance in such cases is to prevent the introduction of directly incriminating evidence without confrontation of the adverse party, in violation of the non-confessing co-defendant's Sixth Amendment rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.