King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 1994
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Carter v. Kentucky · Williams v. State · Bond v. Phelps · Boyd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An examination of the title of the bill reveals that it addresses the subject of crimes and punishments, thereby encompassing both the enhanced penalty statute and the traffic violations schedule. This constitutional provision should be interpreted liberally and broadly, with due regard to its purpose. The enhanced penalty statute does not violate Article 5, § 57 of the Oklahoma Constitution. (Citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“Every act of the Legislature shall embrace but one subject which shall be clearly expressed in its title...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.