640 So. 2d 106 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2017
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · 523 So. 2d 574 - Sims v. State · 376 So. 2d 1149 - Lucas v. State · 345 So. 2d 1061 - Cumbie v. State · 500 So. 2d 125 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough a defendant must timely object to the use of the undiscovered evidence so that it is brought to the attention of the trial court, no magic words exist to trigger the requirement that the trial court conduct a Richardson hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[O]nce put on notice of a violation, the trial court has an affirmative obligation to conduct a hearing without the defendant[] specifically requesting one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.