640 So. 2d 1188
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 29, 1994
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-07-29
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2016
5 state decisions
Relies on 617 So. 2d 1166 - Cleveland v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1994-07-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Willis contends that the trial court erred in imposing conditions of probation in the written judgment and sentence which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. We reverse the sentence and remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
¶2REVERSED and REMANDED.