Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 640 So. 2d 143 - Brennan v. Ruffner

640 So. 2d 143 - Brennan v. Ruffner’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
6
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2015

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

100199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 231 Cal. App. 3d 692 - Skarbrevik v. Cohen, England & Whitfield · 567 So. 2d 430 - The Florida Bar v. Shuminer · 107 Mich. App. 509 - Fassihi v. Sommers, Schwartz, Silver, Schwartz & Tyler, PC · 512 So. 2d 192 - Angel, Cohen & Rogovin v. Oberon Inv., NV · 612 So. 2d 1378 - Espinosa v. Sparber, Shevin, Shapo, Rosen and Heilbronner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n attorney who represents a corporation is `not in privity with and therefore owes no separate duty of diligence and care to an individual shareholder absent special circumstances or an agreement to also represent the shareholder individually.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must prove three elements: the attorney's employment, the attorney's neglect of a reasonable duty and that such negligence resulted in and was the proximate cause of loss to the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.