Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 640 SO2D 3 - Register v. State

Register v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2014

21 state decisions

140199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Thurston · North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. McJunkin Corp. · Shadle v. State · Ex Parte Cofer · Cox v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he evidence of the collateral offenses [involving Register's natural daughter, L.R.] was being offered [by the prosecution] to show that [Register] had a specific modus operandi or method in which he perpetrated the sexual offenses. However, the plan, scheme, or design exception is an extension of the identity exception. . . . Because identity was not at issue in this case, L.R.'s testimony was not admissible under the plan, scheme or design exception."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “testimony offered for the purpose of showing motive is always admissible . . . to show that there was an influence, an inducement, operating on the accused, which may have *Page 227 led or tempted him to commit the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he fact that the prosecutor gave an erroneous reason in arguing for the admissibility of the evidence is unimportant when there is, in fact, a valid reason for admissibility.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.