Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 640 SO2D 39 - Shelton v. State

Shelton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Thompson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If the reviewing officer has, in fact, investigated the charges, and if the evidence developed as a result of the investigation resulted in the disciplinary actions being brought against the appellant, as is alleged, the reviewing officer could hardly be impartial."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[I]f the sole reason for not making the witness available to the appellant at the disciplinary proceeding was that he had been transferred to another facility, that reason would be insufficient to meet the due process requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell. See Thompson v. State, 548 So.2d 650 (Ala.Cr.App.1989).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.