Ex Parte Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 1994
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) A party to an offense under this Chapter may be required to furnish evidence or testify about the offense. “(b) No evidence or testimony required to be furnished under the provisions of this section nor any information directly or indirectly derived from such evidence or testimony may be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a prosecution for aggravated perjury or contempt.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Shorthouse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.