Connor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Mincey v. Arizona · Rummel v. Estelle · Payne v. Arkansas · Garcia v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The State contends that appellant's admitting, after having been given art. 38.22 warnings, that the car was stolen, operated to excuse what had happened before. We must disagree. Under Payne v. Arkansas, 356 U.S. 560 , 78 S.Ct. 844 , 2 L.Ed.2d 975 (1958), the admission into evidence on an involuntary statement made by the accused requires reversal. Admission of an involuntary statement can never constitute harmless error."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Connor v. State · Connor v. State“The trial court thus erred in holding that appellant's statement made in response to Niland's question was voluntarily given, and the evidence was erroneously admitted before the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Connor v. State“appellant's statement [to the intern] was involuntary and thus inadmissible, and the trial court erred in admitting the statement into evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Connor v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.