Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 640 SW2D 758 - Hoot v. Brewer

Hoot v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2002

10 state decisions

60198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McWaters v. Tucker · Donald v. Carr · Geiger v. DeBusk · Oney v. Ammerman · Gray v. Vance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An application of an independent candidate for a place on the general election ballot must comply with the mandatory provisions of V.A.T.S. Election Code_ Each signature on the application must be accompanied by the signer’s address, the number of his voter registration certificate, and the date of signing it. The omission of any one of these items is fatal to that signature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.