Gill v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
641 F.2d 195 · 1981
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Benton v. United States (1992), Woodruff v. United States Department of Labor, Office of Workers Compensation Program (1992)
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on United States v. Demko · Bailey v. United States, Through Department of Army · Avasthi v. United States · Concordia v. United States Postal Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“surer and more immediate relief in return for foregoing more expensive awards outside the system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.