Corey v. Look’s Empirical Analysis
641 F.2d 32 · 1981
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 16 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2005 · most notably U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Healthsource, Inc. (1993), Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. QLT Phototherapeutics, Inc. (2005)
13 federal appellate · 16 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. · Parker v. Brown · Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. · Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar · California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by convincing reasoning that the challenged restraint is necessary to the successful operation of the legislative scheme that the state as sovereign had established.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Even had the authority been granted the statutory power to monopolize the parking market, this would not necessary exempt all means to áchieve this end. For instance, simply because one can enforce zoning laws does not necessarily mean that one can burn down a neighbor's offending building. Thus the Authority cannot establish that there is a "clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed” sovereign state policy favoring the Authority’s boycott of competitors in the parking market.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There is no reason for the courts to revert to the technical concepts of pleading that existed prior to the adoption of the federal rules in order to solve the inherent difficulties of antitrust action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.