Espinoza v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
641 F.2d 535 · 1981
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 49 (Wagner-Peyser Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 2041
Relies on United States v. American Trucking Associations · Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Barbour · Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · United States v. Campos-Serrano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the court finds that the respondent has intentionally violated any provision of this chapter or any regulation prescribed hereunder, it may award damages up to and including an amount equal to the amount of actual damages, or $500 for each violation, or other equitable relief.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.