Candelaria v. Griffin’s Empirical Analysis
641 F.2d 868 · 1981
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2015 · most notably Board of Pardons v. Allen (1987), 26 Conn. App. 132 - Vincenzo v. Warden (1991)
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Williams v. Ward · Oregon State Penitentiary v. Jerry Hammer · Boothe v. Hammock · Delaware State Board of Education v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an expectation [such as Mr. Pettigrew's], with attendant due process rights, may also be based on regulations, policies, understandings, contractual arrangements or institutional practices,” Candelaria v. Griffin, 641 F.2d 868 , 870 n. 2 (10th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted), this limited exception also lends Mr. Pettigrew no aid because, as was true in Candelaria , he”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no other state system which has been the subject of a circuit court opinion has been found to be enough like Nebraska's to establish a liberty interest [in parole release].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Herrera v. Walters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.