United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
641 F.3d 1200 · 2011
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 661 · 18 U.S.C. § 664 (Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States, v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno · United States v. Cabrales · United States v. Reed · Mendoza v. Brown · United States v. Delgado-Uribe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to ascertain whether any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e merely ask whether a rational trier of fact could find each element of the offense charged viewing that evidence in the light most favorable to the government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.