Schafer v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
641 F.3d 49 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 49 (§ 9 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 29 U.S.C. § 209 · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 403 (§ 203 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 8341
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Weinberger v. Salfi · Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc. · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“dependent” on the deceased at the time of his death, within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 402 (d)(1). As part of this analysis, the Appeals Council determined that B.E.B. did not satisfy the criteria for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Beeler v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.