Martise v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
641 F.3d 909 · 2011
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Browning v. Sullivan · Schmidt v. Astrue · Stormo v. Barnhart · Naber v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“well supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent with ... other substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Condon v. Berryhill“inconsistent or contrary to the medical evidence as a whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Condon v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.