Pope v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Hudson v. Reno (1997), Tijerina v. Walters (1987)
11 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Paul v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is necessary ... for plaintiff to know or have reason to know that the adverse action occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tijerina v. Walters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.