Zeigler v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.