Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 641 F. Supp. 2d 613 - United States v. Cates

641 F. Supp. 2d 613 - United States v. Cates’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Katz v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Minnesota, v. Wayne Thomas Carter · United States v. Vega · United States v. Tropiano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]ven if Wright had the authority to grant Brown possession of the vehicle, and even if that possession thereby afforded Brown a legitimate expectation of privacy therein, his expectation’s continued validity would logically coincide with the duration of his permissive use. When Brown returned the vehicle’s keys to Wright, he effectively terminated the period of his permissive use, and accordingly, any expectation of privacy he had in the vehicle. As the Malibu was neither seized nor searched until after Brown had terminated the period of his permissive use, he failed to establish that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy at the relevant time period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.