Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 641 P2D 968 - People v. Bustam

People v. Bustam’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably People v. Drake (1990), Mendez v. People (1999)

25 state decisions

1701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the degree of urgency and the time required to obtain a warrant; (2) reasonable belief that evidence or contraband would be removed or destroyed, (3) the information that those in possession of the evidence or contraband are aware that the police are closing in, and (4) the ease of destroying the evidence or contraband and the awareness that narcotics dealers often try to dispose of narcotics and escape under the circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.