Fraley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Because the two acts of taking `were part of one comprehensive transaction to confiscate the sole victim's property,' only one of those conviction can stand.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 808 So. 2d 201 - Cruller v. State · 740 So. 2d 587 - Sessler v. State

2. “[d]efendant pistol-whipped and shot at the store clerk, took money from the register, and then took the clerk's personal firearm. Count I of the information charged him with armed robbery for taking cash from the victim, identified as the store and/or the clerk; Count II charged him with armed robbery for taking a firearm from the victim, again identified as the store and/or the clerk. Defendant was convicted of two separate counts of armed robbery as charged in Counts I and II of the information....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 808 So. 2d 201 - Cruller v. State